Physical Servers vs Virtual Machines: What are the Differences

One of the most significant technological advancements is the development of virtualization, which has transformed the traditional server infrastructure. The debate between using physical servers and virtual machines has been ongoing for a while now. While both have their advantages and disadvantages, the choice ultimately depends on the specific needs of the organization.

In this blog post, we will explore the differences between physical servers and virtual machines and provide insights into which option might be the best fit for your business. We will discuss the pros and cons of each option, the cost implications, performance factors, and scalability.

What is a Physical Server?
A physical server is a standalone hardware device that is comprised of processor, memory, network connection, and operating system for managing programs and applications. A physical server can only support and run one type of operating system at a time. Physical Servers are ideal for applications that require high levels of performance and security as there is no share of resources with multiple users.

Physical servers come in different sizes and configurations, from tower servers that can fit on a desk to larger rack-mounted servers that can hold multiple processors and hard drives. They can be purchased or leased and are typically managed on-premises by the organization’s IT staff.

Read this article to know more…